Buy on Amazon
$356.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 174 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 15% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G3930 - 183 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-7640X - $63.92 vs $356.7
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i5-7640X - 51 vs 112 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-7640X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-7640X X-Series Processor 4 Cores up to 4.2 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 112W
Buy for $356.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75534 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3930 Dual-core (2 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75534 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-7640X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
34.525837592277114%
Multi-Core
1043
19.77251184834123%
Intel Core i5-7640X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 112 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
