Buy on Amazon
$135
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Deathloop than Celeron G3900 - 179 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - $39.9 vs $135.0
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 51 vs 91 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-7600K LGA 1151 Desktop Processors (BX80677I57600K)
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76786 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76785 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-7600K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
38.553417385534175%
Multi-Core
992
23.473734027449126%
Intel Core i5-7600K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 91 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
