Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7600 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7600 is 70 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 121 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 94% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $95.97 vs $1595.95
- Up to 94% better value when playing Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $0.79 vs $13.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 44 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $95.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
119
98.34710743801654%
Value, $/FPS
$13.41/FPS
5.891126025354213%
Price, $
$1595.95
6%
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 22 |
4 | Threads | 44 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 145 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |