Key Differences
In short — Core i5-760 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G640 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-760 is 686 days older than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield IV than Pentium G640 - 371 vs 370 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-760 - $30.0 vs $88.2
- Up to 67% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-760 - $0.08 vs $0.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
371
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
33.333333333333336%
Price, $
$88.2
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $88.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
FPS
370
99.73045822102425%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$30
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $30 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Lynnfield | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |