Buy on Amazon
$56.68
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $4938
Availability
MSRP in USD: $4938
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7500T outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7500T is 70 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 96% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $56.68 vs $1595.95
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 35 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 44 vs 4 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel BX80677I57500T 7th Generation Intel Core i5-7500T Processor
Buy for $56.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76537 minutes ago
Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699A v4 22 Core 2.40GHZ 55MB 145W CM8066003197800 (OEM Tray Processor)
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76535 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1110
94.46808510638299%
Multi-Core
3076
31.978376130574905%
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 22 |
| 4 | Threads | 44 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 145 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
