Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1207 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $69.0 vs $140.99
- Up to 49% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.58 vs $1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-7500T - 124 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4152 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
50%
Price, $
$140.99
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $140.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |