Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2478 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $119.0 vs $438.49
- Up to 57% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-14900K - $2.16 vs $5.04 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 58% better in Starfield than Core i5-7400 - 87 vs 55 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 32 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
55
63.2183908045977%
Value, $/FPS
$2.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$119
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
87
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.04/FPS
42.85714285714286%
Price, $
$438.49
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $438.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1176
37.92325056433409%
Multi-Core
3232
15.39047619047619%
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |