Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7300HQ outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7300HQ is 2150 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7300HQ
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon X5675 - 120 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7300HQ - 12 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7300HQ | vs | Intel Xeon X5675 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Westmere-EP |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |