Buy on Amazon
$39
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $250
Availability
MSRP in USD: $250
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7300HQ outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7300HQ and Celeron G3930T have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7300HQ
- Performs up to 2% better in Dishonored 2 than Celeron G3930T - 262 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-7300HQ - 35 vs 45 Watts
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66311 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-7300HQ
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
50.09140767824497%
Multi-Core
948
31.812080536912752%
Intel Core i5-7300HQ | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i5-7300HQ or Celeron G3930T
Dishonored 2, 1920 x 1080, Very High
29 FPS
$27.55/FPS
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
Core i5-7300HQ
16 GB, 256 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$798.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.