Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-661 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-661 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 4646 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-661.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-661
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $80.0 vs $476.53
- Up to 80% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-13900KF - $0.42 vs $2.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 87 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-661 - 231 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-661 - 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.06/FPS
20%
Price, $
$476.53
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $476.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-661 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
87 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |