Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1764 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $179.95 vs $225.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-10900F - $0.53 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-6600T - 360 vs 341 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 20 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
341
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $179.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2471 minutes ago
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2472 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |