Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the more expensive Core i5-6600T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1758 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-6600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-6600T - 161 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i5-6600T - $150.0 vs $179.95
- Up to 19% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-6600T - $0.93 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 8 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $179.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5311 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5312 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |