Buy on Amazon
$489.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $192
Availability
MSRP in USD: $192
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-7940X outperforms the more expensive Core i5-6500TE on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-7940X is 691 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-6500TE.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500TE
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-6500TE - 158 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-6500TE - $397.83 vs $489.95
- Up to 20% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-6500TE - $2.52 vs $3.14 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500TE - 28 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Intel Core i5 i5-6500TE Quad-core (4 Core) 2.3GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack Model CM8066201938000
Buy for $489.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5977 minutes ago
Core i9-7940X
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$397.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-7940X X-Series Processor 14 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W
Buy for $397.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5978 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-6500TE
Desktop • Oct 11th, 2015
Core i9-7940X
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6500TE | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 11th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 28 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
