Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6500TE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6500TE is 905 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500TE
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G4900 - 169 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-6500TE - $68.02 vs $489.95
- Up to 85% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-6500TE - $0.43 vs $2.9 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 11th, 2015
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.9/FPS
14%
Price, $
$489.95
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $489.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14628 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
160
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14628 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 11th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6500TE | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 11th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |