Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675C outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-5675C is 1096 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 13% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 106 vs 94 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 65 vs 87 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 8 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-5675C
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Xeon E3-1290 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 |
|---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | May 14th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 87 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
