Buy on Amazon
$90
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $276
Availability
MSRP in USD: $276
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700 is 599 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - $90.0 vs $167.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-7700 - $0.47 vs $0.86 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Core i5-5675C - 194 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Broadwell Core i5-5675C 3.1 4 NA BX80658i55675C
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-7700 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.2 GHz LGA 1151 100/200 Series 65W
Buy for $167 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-5675C
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Core i7-7700
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
|---|---|---|
| May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i5-5675C or Core i7-7700
Rust, 1920 x 1080, High
15 FPS
$112.59/FPS
GeForce GTX 1050
Core i7-7700
16 GB, 128 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,688.88
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
