Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675C outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-5675C is 991 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-4130 - 166 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-5675C - $22.92 vs $90.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-5675C - $0.15 vs $0.54 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |