Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Core i5-560M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 3167 days newer than Core i5-560M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-560M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 13% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-560M - 176 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-560M - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-560M doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-560M
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-560M | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
