Buy on Amazon
$299
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Core i5-540M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 2803 days newer than Core i5-540M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-540M
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 35 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-540M - 130 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-540M - 24 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$299
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-7920X Tray Processor (CD8067303753300)- OEM Pack
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-540M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i9-7920X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-540M | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
