Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1965 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $55.26 vs $495.15
- Up to 88% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-9920X - $0.45 vs $3.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-4670S - 128 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 24 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
122
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7476 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.87/FPS
11%
Price, $
$495.15
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $495.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7475 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670S | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |