Buy on Amazon
$55.26
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 1552 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $55.26 vs $302.0
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 8% better in War Thunder than Core i5-4670S - 178 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 28 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Intel Core I5-4670S I5 4670S 3.1 GHz Used Quad-Core CPU Processor 6M 65W LGA 1150
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75681 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-7940X X-Series Processor 14 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W
Buy for $302 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75681 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i5-4670S
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i9-7940X
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4670S
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1151
84.014598540146%
Multi-Core
3254
32.79250226745944%
Intel Core i5-4670S | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 28 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
