Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3404 days newer than Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 70% better in War Thunder than Core i5-4670K - 290 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 32 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i5-4670K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i9-13900KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4670K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1255
42.213252606794484%
Multi-Core
3544
17.63096363365007%
Intel Core i5-4670K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
