Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460S outperforms Xeon E3-1220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4460S is 1134 days newer than Xeon E3-1220.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460S
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1220 - 179 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-4460S
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Xeon E3-1220
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4460S | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1220 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 80 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
