Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460 outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4460 is 1517 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Performs up to 13% better in Rust than Xeon W3680 - 179 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 84 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 12 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $64.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4460 | vs | Intel Xeon W3680 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon |
Haswell | Codename | Westmere-EP |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |