Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4440 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4440.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $128.3 vs $165.86
- Up to 17% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11600KF - $0.97 vs $1.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-4440 - 142 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
132
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $128.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
82%
Price, $
$165.86
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4440 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |