Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1825 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 37 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 5% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Core i5-4300M - 139 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4300M - 32 vs 4 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1075
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2892 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4300M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |