Buy on Amazon
$119.49
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $212
Availability
MSRP in USD: $212
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3570K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1513 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3570K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3570K - 126 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i5-3570K - $7.99 vs $119.49
- Up to 94% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3570K - $0.06 vs $1.0 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570K - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel Core i5-3570K Quad-Core Processor 3.4 GHz 4 Core LGA 1155 - BX80637I53570K
Buy for $119.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$7.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Corp. BX80660E51620V4 Xeon Processor E5-1620 v4
Buy for $7.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3570K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.