Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570K is 1220 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G3900 - 148 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-3570K - $39.9 vs $119.49
- Up to 67% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-3570K - $0.27 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570K - 51 vs 77 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
33%
Price, $
$119.49
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $119.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8063 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
146
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8063 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |