Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570K outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570K is 200 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8120 - 157 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-3570K - $39.99 vs $119.49
- Up to 64% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3570K - $0.27 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570K - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
157
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
35%
Price, $
$119.49
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $119.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7914 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7915 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570K | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |