Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3550S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2923 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3550S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3550S - 190 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i5-3550S - $120.0 vs $149.95
- Up to 28% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3550S - $0.63 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550S - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10469 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10469 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3550S | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |