Buy on Amazon
$149.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-3550S outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-3550S is 408 days older than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550S
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-9590 - 117 vs 116 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than FX-9590 - $149.95 vs $288.02
- Up to 48% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-9590 - $1.28 vs $2.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550S - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3550S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
117
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL SR0P3 Intel Core i5-3550S 6M Cache 3.00GHz FCLGA1155 Processor CM80637 Intel-Core-i5-3550S-SR0P3-3-00GHZ-6MB-5GT-s-LGA-1155-Socket-H2-Quad
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2829 minutes ago
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
116
99.14529914529915%
Value, $/FPS
$2.48/FPS
51.61290322580645%
Price, $
$288.02
52%
AMD FD9590FHHKWOF FX-9590 8-core 4.7 GHz Socket AM3+ 220W Black Edition Desktop Processor
Buy for $288.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2831 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3550S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3550S | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
