Buy on Amazon
$149.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 3000G outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3550S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2761 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3550S.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3550S - 178 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-3550S - $52.46 vs $149.95
- Up to 67% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3550S - $0.29 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-3550S - 35 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
INTEL SR0P3 Intel Core i5-3550S 6M Cache 3.00GHz FCLGA1155 Processor CM80637 Intel-Core-i5-3550S-SR0P3-3-00GHZ-6MB-5GT-s-LGA-1155-Socket-H2-Quad
Buy for $149.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Athlon 3000G 2-Core, 4-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon Graphics
Buy for $52.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-3550S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3550S | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
