Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Core i5-3470T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2733 days newer than Core i5-3470T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 22% better in New World than Core i5-3470T - 121 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470T - 48 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1070
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,070 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1587 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
565
33.893221355728855%
Multi-Core
1135
8.52294060223774%
Intel Core i5-3470T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |