Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i5-3470T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2958 days newer than Core i5-3470T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 17% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i5-3470T - 218 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470T - 24 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
218
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
565
32.67784846732215%
Multi-Core
1135
11.3160518444666%
Intel Core i5-3470T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |