Buy on Amazon
$168.11
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Core i5-3470T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 2592 days newer than Core i5-3470T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 9% better in God of War than Core i5-3470T - 178 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470T - 12 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 3600XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$168.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
CPU Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT R5 3600XT 3.8 GHz Six-Core Twelve-Thread CPU Processor 7NM 95W L3=32M 100-000000281 Socket AM4
Buy for $168.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2013 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3470T
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Ryzen 5 3600XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3470T
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
565
33.15727699530516%
Multi-Core
1135
15.715868180559402%
Intel Core i5-3470T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
