Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2553 days newer than Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3470S - 132 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470S - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
