Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470S outperforms Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3470S is 684 days newer than Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-760 - 117 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
115
98.29059829059828%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$88.2
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $88.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4557 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
75.66225165562915%
Multi-Core
1280
74.24593967517401%
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |