Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3770 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $68.97 vs $469.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-13900K - $0.41 vs $2.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 20% better in Deathloop than Core i5-3470 - 203 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 32 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
169
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12129 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.32/FPS
17%
Price, $
$469.99
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |