Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $59.0 vs $99.95
- Up to 16% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i5-10400F - $0.81 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 41% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i5-3470 - 103 vs 73 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 12 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1157 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
103
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
83%
Price, $
$99.95
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |