Buy on Amazon
$68.97
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $184
Availability
MSRP in USD: $184
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4238 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - $68.97 vs $87.46
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 38% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-3470 - 153 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Core i5-3470 Quad-Core Processor 3.2 GHz 4 Core LGA 1155 - BX80637I53470
Buy for $68.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73813 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-14100F Desktop Processor 4 cores (4 P-cores + 0 E-cores) up to 4.7 GHz
Buy for $87.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73812 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-3470
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3470
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
622
24.959871589085072%
Multi-Core
1840
21.957040572792362%
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 77 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
