Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-3470 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-3470 is 375 days older than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - 171 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than FX-9590 - $59.0 vs $298.02
- Up to 80% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - $0.35 vs $1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 77 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10865 minutes ago
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10865 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 220 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |