Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $86.0 vs $419.95
- Up to 79% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i9-13900F - $0.46 vs $2.16 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-3450S - 194 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 32 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
189
97.42268041237114%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.16/FPS
21.296296296296298%
Price, $
$419.95
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $419.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
21.39194139194139%
Multi-Core
1681
9.76247168825135%
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |