Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $95.0 vs $143.7
- Up to 25% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-10600K - $0.42 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 13% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-3450S - 256 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 12 vs 4 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10653 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
256
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
74%
Price, $
$143.7
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $143.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10654 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |