Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3450S is 218 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than Celeron G1610 - 160 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-3450S - $37.0 vs $86.0
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450S - 55 vs 65 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$86
43%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
72.94520547945206%
Multi-Core
739
43.96192742415229%
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |