Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 3112 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $86.0 vs $314.97
- Up to 70% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.59 vs $1.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than Core i5-3450S - 159 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 32 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
145
91.19496855345912%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.99/FPS
29.64824120603015%
Price, $
$314.97
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $314.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
26.678848789401556%
Multi-Core
1681
13.825150094580147%
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |