Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-3450 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-3450 is 651 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-760 - 117 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i5-760 - $95.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-760 - $0.81 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
117
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58286 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
115
98.29059829059828%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
93.10344827586208%
Price, $
$100
95%
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58286 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |