Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 8945HS outperforms Core i5-3380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 8945HS is 3991 days newer than Core i5-3380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3380M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3380M - 150 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3380M - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3380M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 8945HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3380M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
537
22.667792317433516%
Multi-Core
1071
9.256698357821953%
Intel Core i5-3380M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
