Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3360M outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3360M is 233 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3360M
- Performs up to 2% better in Minecraft than FX-4100 - 607 vs 594 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-3360M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3360M | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
