Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Core i5-3350P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2459 days newer than Core i5-3350P.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3350P - 122 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i5-3350P - 45 vs 69 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3350P - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-3350P doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-3350P
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3350P | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 69 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
