Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9960X outperforms Core i5-3340M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9960X is 2117 days newer than Core i5-3340M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3340M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-9960X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9960X
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Core i5-3340M - 151 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3340M - 32 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1579
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,579 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3340M | vs | Intel Core i9-9960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |